<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s media strategy: There&#8217;s an app for that</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themediawonk.com/2010/01/29/apples-media-strategy-theres-an-app-for-thaa-cloudy-view-of-the-ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themediawonk.com/2010/01/29/apples-media-strategy-theres-an-app-for-thaa-cloudy-view-of-the-ipad/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Media Wonk</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2010/01/29/apples-media-strategy-theres-an-app-for-thaa-cloudy-view-of-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=798#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Scott--I agree. I find the lack of 16:9 puzzling. I&#039;ve been meaning to write about it but I still can&#039;t come up with a good theory for why Apple went with 4:3. I have to assume there&#039;s a 16:9 version in the wings somewhere. Perhaps they just wanted to emphasize the print-like form factor out of the box and a more video-friendly version is coming? Perhaps they&#039;re waiting for touch-screen OLED displays to get big enough? At any rate, I think the TV guys will be OK with it for now, particularly for stuff that isn&#039;t native 16:9 anyway. But you make a very valid point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott&#8211;I agree. I find the lack of 16:9 puzzling. I&#8217;ve been meaning to write about it but I still can&#8217;t come up with a good theory for why Apple went with 4:3. I have to assume there&#8217;s a 16:9 version in the wings somewhere. Perhaps they just wanted to emphasize the print-like form factor out of the box and a more video-friendly version is coming? Perhaps they&#8217;re waiting for touch-screen OLED displays to get big enough? At any rate, I think the TV guys will be OK with it for now, particularly for stuff that isn&#8217;t native 16:9 anyway. But you make a very valid point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Shuster</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2010/01/29/apples-media-strategy-theres-an-app-for-thaa-cloudy-view-of-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Shuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=798#comment-632</guid>
		<description>This content owner may recognize and seize the opportunity...when the iPad is 16:9.  But if this first edition is going to letterbox all our stuff, I don&#039;t see myself buying an SDK for it yet.  Surely there MUST be a 16:9 version just around the corner, upgrade priced and somehow better than Joojoo, which will by then already be in the market offering full-screen 16:9 video.

The biggest mystery is how I could possibly have watched the keynote and made it all the way to today --  February 15th -- without hearing anyone scream &quot;OMG!  The screen is 4:3 - !!&quot; 

I have loved nearly all Apple products I have ever purchased (I didn&#039;t buy a Lisa) and may end up loving iPad, but why would anyone would create an HD video screen at 4:3 in 2010?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This content owner may recognize and seize the opportunity&#8230;when the iPad is 16:9.  But if this first edition is going to letterbox all our stuff, I don&#8217;t see myself buying an SDK for it yet.  Surely there MUST be a 16:9 version just around the corner, upgrade priced and somehow better than Joojoo, which will by then already be in the market offering full-screen 16:9 video.</p>
<p>The biggest mystery is how I could possibly have watched the keynote and made it all the way to today &#8212;  February 15th &#8212; without hearing anyone scream &#8220;OMG!  The screen is 4:3 &#8211; !!&#8221; </p>
<p>I have loved nearly all Apple products I have ever purchased (I didn&#8217;t buy a Lisa) and may end up loving iPad, but why would anyone would create an HD video screen at 4:3 in 2010?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
