<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Media Wonk &#187; FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themediawonk.com/tag/fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themediawonk.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:23:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Getting nowhere on TV Everywhere</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2010/01/06/getting-nowhere-on-tv-everywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2010/01/06/getting-nowhere-on-tv-everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable & Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Everywhere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Media Wonk is en route to Las Vegas for the Consumer Electronics Show as this is being written, where I expect to be inundated with all things 3D. Between taking off from Washington, DC and a stopover in Minneapolis, however (there’s a reason Delta Airlines went bankrupt awhile back, by the way), my BlackBerry [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2010/01/06/getting-nowhere-on-tv-everywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast&#8217;s over-the-top lobbying</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/12/09/comcasts-over-the-top-lobbying/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/12/09/comcasts-over-the-top-lobbying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cable & Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC Universal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Everywhere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here in Washington, DC, TV viewers are treated to an unusual array of commercials: a fairly steady drumbeat of obscure issue-advocacy ads sponsored by industry-funded front groups aimed at influencing Congress by showing off the group&#8217;s lobbying muscle. Generally speaking, the more blandly benign-sounding the group&#8217;s name, the more mendacious the policy proposal. Groups calling [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/12/09/comcasts-over-the-top-lobbying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The un-reality of Partygate</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/12/03/the-un-reality-of-the-partygate/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/12/03/the-un-reality-of-the-partygate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cable & Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bravo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC Universal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salahi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House party crashers is not a subject that would usually occupy The Media Wonk. But here in Washington, with so many people running about, flapping their arms like frightened hens over the horror of it all, it&#8217;s a very difficult story to ignore. After the crashers themselves and White House social secretary Desiree [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/12/03/the-un-reality-of-the-partygate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selectable outputs, or selectable logic?</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/11/30/selectable-outputs-or-selectable-logic/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/11/30/selectable-outputs-or-selectable-logic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long-running battle at the Federal Communications Commission over the MPAA&#8217;s petition for a waiver of the rules banning the use of selectable output controls on devices that can receive TV signals is turning into a textbook example of how regulation can distort business decisions. I almost hate to write that sentence because I don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/11/30/selectable-outputs-or-selectable-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neutrality on net neutrality is not an option</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/10/09/neutrality-on-net-neutrality-is-not-an-option/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/10/09/neutrality-on-net-neutrality-is-not-an-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing its campaignagainst the FCC&#8217;s planned net neutrality regulation, the Washington Post launched its new Post Tech blog Thursday with an interviewwith Carnegie Mellon computer science professor and net-neutrality skeptic,  David Farber. According to Farber: [I]t&#8217;s very hard to define ["neutrality" and "reasonable network management"]. The problem here is everyone talks about reasonable network management, but if [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/10/09/neutrality-on-net-neutrality-is-not-an-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
