<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Media Wonk &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themediawonk.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themediawonk.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:23:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube Court: Viacom Dios</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2010/06/24/youtube-court-viacom-dios/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2010/06/24/youtube-court-viacom-dios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viacom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lesson for content owners from yesterday&#8217;s smackdown of Viacom by U.S. District Court Judge Louis Stanton in its lawsuit against YouTube/Google should be clear (which, of course, is no guarantee it will be): stop bringing DMCA  safe-harbor suits against online service providers. It&#8217;s not working, and it&#8217;s past time to get on with plan [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2010/06/24/youtube-court-viacom-dios/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The coming battle over used e-books (Updated)</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/10/16/the-coming-battle-over-used-e-books/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/10/16/the-coming-battle-over-used-e-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday, Google announced during the Frankfurt Book Fair that its long-planned e-commerce platform for digital books will launch by June 2010. Christened Google Editions, represents a major departure from most current e-book offerings in that it won&#8217;t be confined to any particular reading device or desktop viewing application. Instead, Google will cache users&#8217; purchases [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/10/16/the-coming-battle-over-used-e-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could online ad exchanges work for news, too?</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/09/24/could-online-ad-exchanges-for-news-too/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/09/24/could-online-ad-exchanges-for-news-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Google launched its long-expected bid to conquer the online display advertising business to complement its domination of the search ad market by unveiling the new, auction-based DoubleClick Ad Exchange, built on the ad-serving company it acquired in 2007 for $3.1 billion and has spent the two years since steering through the regulatory process. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/09/24/could-online-ad-exchanges-for-news-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Authors Guild doesn&#8217;t like the sunrise, blames the rooster</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/09/04/authors-guild-doesnt-like-the-sunrise-blames-the-rooster/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/09/04/authors-guild-doesnt-like-the-sunrise-blames-the-rooster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Authors Guild is not impressed with Amazon&#8217;s opposition to the Google Books settlement. In a 49-page brief (pdf) filed with Judge Denny Chin on Tuesday, the Kindle-maker warned of the potentially anti-competitive effects both of the blanket license in the agreement for Google to scan and sell orphan works and of the price-fixing power of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/09/04/authors-guild-doesnt-like-the-sunrise-blames-the-rooster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orphans in the storm</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/09/02/orphans-in-the-storm/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/09/02/orphans-in-the-storm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pity Judge Denny Chin, the federal district court jurist in New York presiding over the Google Book Search case (The Authors Guild, et. al. v. Google, Inc.). Having steered the long, complex class action to within sight of the finish line he suddenly finds himself the object of an intense last-minute lobbying campaign from interests that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/09/02/orphans-in-the-storm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
