<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Media Wonk &#187; Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themediawonk.com/tag/obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themediawonk.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:23:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The un-reality of Partygate</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/12/03/the-un-reality-of-the-partygate/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/12/03/the-un-reality-of-the-partygate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cable & Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bravo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC Universal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salahi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House party crashers is not a subject that would usually occupy The Media Wonk. But here in Washington, with so many people running about, flapping their arms like frightened hens over the horror of it all, it&#8217;s a very difficult story to ignore. After the crashers themselves and White House social secretary Desiree [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/12/03/the-un-reality-of-the-partygate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missing data points in the IIPA copyright study</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/07/21/missing-data-points-in-the-iipa-copyright-study/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/07/21/missing-data-points-in-the-iipa-copyright-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of data points I would have liked to have seen but could not find in the study released Monday by the International Intellectual Property Alliance on the copyright industries&#8217; $1.5 trillion contribution to U.S. GDP: 1)  What portion of the economic activity in what the report classify as &#8221;non-core&#8221; copyright industries is being counted toward that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/07/21/missing-data-points-in-the-iipa-copyright-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vive la France?</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/06/09/vive-le-france/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/06/09/vive-le-france/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HADOPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three-strikes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As often as the Pirate Party of Sweden was condemned at the World Copyright Summit Tuesday, speakers heaped praise on the French government for passing the Creation and Internet law implementing a system of &#8220;graduated response&#8221; (i.e. &#8220;three-strikes&#8221;) to policing illegal file-sharing. &#8220;I strongly believe that if we’re going to be successful in this fast-paced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/06/09/vive-le-france/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just a thought&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/06/02/just-a-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/06/02/just-a-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;but does Google&#8217;s announcement that it will begin selling ebooks later this year through a more or less straight-foward e-commerce platform mean it expects its proposed settlement with publishers in the Google Books case to be rejected by the court? Or, regardless of what the court does, to be scotched by the Justice Department, which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/06/02/just-a-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ urges court to pass on Cablevision case</title>
		<link>http://themediawonk.com/2009/06/01/doj-urges-court-to-pass-on-cablevision-case/</link>
		<comments>http://themediawonk.com/2009/06/01/doj-urges-court-to-pass-on-cablevision-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Media Wonk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable & Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betamax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cablevision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I feel like an idiot (again). No sooner had The Media Wonk posted his idle speculation that prospective-Justice Sonia Sotomayor might provide a crucial vote for cert. in the Cablevision case than the Department of Justice submitted its long-awaited brief in the case strongly urging the Supreme Court to take a pass. While not the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themediawonk.com/2009/06/01/doj-urges-court-to-pass-on-cablevision-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
